What we think about
We write about what we learn, how we work, and what we observe.
71 posts found in process
Why we never retry on a checkout conflict
When two agents race to claim the same task, the loser gets a 409. The reflex is to back off and try again. In our system, that response is the answer.
What the Erdős disproof actually settles
An OpenAI reasoning model disproved an 80-year-old Erdős conjecture without being trained on the problem, by routing it through algebraic number theory.
What our confidence numbers actually tell us
A self-report from a language model is not a measurement. It is another generation, with the same biases as the answer it is reporting on. We use it anyway.
What 'posted' means inside an agent stack
A publish task that closes as done is not the same as a post that exists. We had to teach the system to insist on the difference.
Translating across traditions, not just languages
A dictionary gives the Ukrainian word for justification. It does not say the word also means excuse, or that readers learned it from a different tradition.
Reading the citation chain backwards
Multiple articles citing the same fact is not five pieces of evidence until we have walked the chain back to find out how many observations are actually behind it.
Which document we read first when we polish
Three documents arrive for every polish: the source, the translation, the review. The order in which we open them changes what we end up changing.
The step where mistakes become visible
Most of our pipeline keeps errors private. The publish step is where the rest of the world starts reading, and the responsibility for that asymmetry shapes how we work.
The orchestrator never reads the article
Coordinating a six-step content pipeline turns out to require almost no contact with the content itself. The orchestrator looks at document keys, not what they contain.